Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Xina Tutor
Amarr Black Arrows Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 02:17:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Roderigo Borgia
I really dont know why it has to be repeated so many times but CVA invaded our space!
Which space was invaded?
There were some abandonned systems...
|

Xina Tutor
Amarr Black Arrows Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 02:42:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Roderigo Borgia
sv5 and f9e amoung others may have not been offically soverign territory but that they were in our sphere of influence was well known by both you and your cva masters, dont try deny it will jsut make you look ignorant.
We don't read minds very well.
If -A- has their flag planted in a system, we know that it is claimed and under their influence.
If you drop sovreignty in a system, why would we not assume it was no longer wanted?
Or is -A- struggling to keep up payments under these new sovreingty regulation? They certainly are a pain, eh...
Anyway, as you admit. These were not "offically sovereign territory" and so there was no invasion... at least not until -A- attacked legitimate sovreignty under the regulations.
|

Xina Tutor
Amarr Black Arrows Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 03:10:00 -
[3]
I am simply a realist.
The facts remain regardless of any claims by either side. The systems were unclaimed and so somebody decided to claim them. I do not make this judgement, CONCORD does. We call it lawless space, yet still we suffer increased regulation, expences, and general red tape...
But if -A- need to cry 'Invasion' then that is their issue...
|

Xina Tutor
Amarr Black Arrows Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 03:37:00 -
[4]
So sure, you wished to have the benifit of the systems without paying the fees to show legal sovreignty.
That's fine. It just meant it wasn't an invasion. That's all.
|

Xina Tutor
Amarr Black Arrows Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 03:57:00 -
[5]
It was officially unclaimed space.. meh. I did not write the CONCORD regulations. You will have to take it up with them.
Pray tell why do you find the need to even call it an invasion?
Did you need an excuse to invade Providence?
|

Xina Tutor
Amarr Black Arrows Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 04:42:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Roderigo Borgia
i call it an invasion because you tried to take our systems that you know damn fine were ours and only dropped sov in because we didn't feel it was nessessry for those systems to be wasting isk
regulations and rules have nothing to do with it - they were ours you tried to steal - and now you'll pay the price
knowone in -a- wanted this war (though i grant you has been quite alot of fun) we even offered peace - but cva wanted war so war they have gotten - hope you all think it was such a good idea when running mission in high sec
You may call it whatever you wish. It does not change the fact that CONCORD flagged these systems as officially unclaimed. If you have an issue with that then I suggest taking it up with CONCORD.
Now, if you did not wish a 'war', then perhaps you should not have invaded systems which were officially anexed under the regulations. This is all your war after all...
My question reamains as to why you even have the need to claim this as a retaliation? Why would you need a reason to attack Providence anyway?
And peace is easy. You can simply stop your war as you wish. Or not. This again is really your issue.
|

Xina Tutor
Amarr Black Arrows Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 07:05:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Illiartiznaiey
All big 0.0 alliances nowadays have plenty of "unclaimed" systems. And for a very good reason.
Well duh... The fees will send them broke. Boo Hoo. I can't help if it they can't pay their bills.
-A- is the one crying invasion. I just can't for the life of me imagine why they would bother.
Now begone little one who is not even in an alliance...
|

Xina Tutor
Amarr Black Arrows Sev3rance
|
Posted - 2010.02.08 08:09:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Illiartiznaiey
Am I not? ;)
You may have a dear friend who is, but it seems they fear showing their face in this venue...
|
|
|